Basis of preparation

Contents

Fair presentation and compliance with IFRS


Financial statements should fairly present the entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows [IAS1R.13]. Appropriate and consistent application of the Framework and IFRS is presumed to result in financial statements that give a fair presentation [IAS1R.13]. All IFRS and SIC Interpretations, including disclosure requirements, should be applied before financial statements can be described as being prepared in accordance with IFRS [IAS1R.14].

 

Use the quick links below to access specific components, solutions and related publications.

   
Linked components  Linked components  
 
  Linked publicatons  Linked publications    
   
  Linked solutions  Linked solutions    
   

The requirement to comply in full with all IFRS and SICs is designed to prevent selective application of the standards and publication of so-called 'IFRS-lite' financial statements. Financial statements that do not comply with specific standards are not IFRS-compliant [IAS1R.14].

All financial statements that comply with IFRS must contain a statement to that effect [IAS1R.14].

Application of inappropriate accounting methods cannot be rectified by disclosure of these methods or explanatory material [IAS1R.16].

Fair and understandable presentation
A fair presentation of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows requires the provision of relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information [IAS1R.15]. To be understood clearly, the presentation and disclosures should not be misleading. Readers should be able to understand the information presented without undue effort [F.24-46].

The titles and captions used should be consistent with the definitions used in the standards. Terms that the standards do not define should be clear, accurate and unambiguous, so that users will understand the underlying transactions or events. The level of disclosure should be consistent for items of similar significance (that is, proper weighting of disclosures).

Fair presentation may require an entity to go beyond IFRS disclosure requirements in order to enable users to understand and assess the effects of significant unusual events, transactions or accounting treatments [IAS1R.15(c)].

Departures from IFRS
The application of IFRS requirements in full, possibly supplemented by additional disclosures, will lead to a fair presentation of an entity's financial situation in virtually all circumstances [IAS1R.15]. However, management can rebut this presumption in extremely rare circumstances if it believes that applying a particular IFRS requirement would be misleading [IAS1R.17]. A departure from an IFRS is not permitted where it is made only in order to comply with national accounting and/or legal requirements.

Departures from IFRS are very seldom seen in practice. The requirements and disclosures are extensive [IAS1R.18] .



The principal assumptions of preparation


Financial statements are presented fairly when they are based on the following assumptions [IAS1R.23-35]:

a) going concern;
b) consistency; and
c) accruals.

There are two more assumptions of secondary importance which should also be followed. These are:

d) materiality and aggregation;
e) offsetting.

Provided all five assumptions have been followed, no specific disclosure to this effect is required.



Going concern


An entity is a going concern if it has neither the intention nor the need to liquidate or to cease its operations within at least 12 months from the balance sheet date [IAS1R.24]. At each balance sheet date, management should assess the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Material uncertainties concerning the entity's ability to continue as a going concern should be disclosed [IAS1R.23] .

Where the entity ceases to be a going concern, management should prepare the financial statements on a different basis [F.23]. Where the financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact should be disclosed and the basis of preparation followed should be described. The reasons why the entity is no longer considered a going concern should be given [IAS1R.23].

An entity should not prepare its financial statements on a going concern basis if management determines after the balance sheet date either that it intends to liquidate the entity or cease trading, or that it has no realistic alternative to doing so [IAS10R.14].


Accrual basis of accounting


Revenues and costs are recognised as they are earned or incurred under the accrual basis of accounting [IAS1R.26]. The net profit for each period should reflect that period's transactions, events and circumstances . This aids the assessment of the entity's performance and financial position. The cash basis of accounting should only be used for cash flow information [IAS1R.25].

Specific provisions regarding the appropriate timing of recognition and measurement on the accrual basis are provided in relevant standards.

The matching principle, which is often associated with the accrual basis of accounting, is not an underlying assumption. Expenses are recorded in the accounting records and the financial statements as incurred. An expense should be recognised in the income statement in the period to which it relates or in direct association with the earning of specific items of income, and hence when the related income is recognised [IAS1R.26].

The matching of costs to future revenues should not be used as a basis to defer costs on the balance sheet. Costs can only be recognised as an asset if they meet the asset recognition criteria [F.95]. For example, start-up costs should not be capitalised, or deferred, because management expects that revenues will be generated in the future.


Consistency of preparation


A change in presentation and classification of items from one period to the next is permitted only when it is a result of [IAS1R.27];

a) a significant change in the nature of the entity's operations;
b) identification of a more appropriate presentation; or
c) the requirements of a new IFRS or SIC.

Where such changes are made, the corresponding figures for prior periods should also conform to the new presentation. The nature, amounts and reasons for the amendments should also be disclosed [IAS1R.28].

An entity should disclose the reason for not reclassifying comparative information if it is impossible or economically unreasonable to determine comparable amounts for previous periods. The nature of changes that would have been made if the amendments had been practicable should also be given [IAS1R.39].

Changes on the basis of a more appropriate presentation should only be made where the benefit of the alternative presentation is clear [IAS1R.28]. Such changes will therefore be infrequent.

When an entity presents summary financial information (such as five and ten year summaries), the presentation should be consistent with the most recent presentation adopted in the financial statements. Management should disclose the fact where a consistent presentation is not feasible.


Materiality and aggregation


Each material item or group of items should be presented separately in the financial statements. Immaterial items, however, should be aggregated with amounts of similar nature and function [IAS1R.29].

Information is material if it might reasonably affect evaluations and decisions in respect of the reporting entity, or if its omission or misstatement could influence user's economic decisions. Information will also be material where the nature and circumstances of the transaction or event are such that users of the financial statements should be made aware of them .

When evaluating whether an item is material, each case must be judged by its size and nature. The assessment should be made in the context of the financial statements as a whole and in relation to relevant financial statement components . Qualitative as well as quantitative factors should be assessed. The sensitivity of an item to adjustment should be considered.


Offsetting


Offsetting, or netting, of assets with liabilities or income with expenses is prohibited unless it is explicitly permitted or required by another standard [IAS1R.32].

Offsetting does not include the deduction of amounts representing an impairment of assets. Similarly, reporting the carrying amount of assets net of accumulated depreciation and amortisation is not an instance of offsetting [IAS1R.33].

There is no requirement to disclose the gross amount of accounts receivable and the related provision for bad and doubtful accounts. However, the valuation allowance against such accounts should be included in the carrying amount.

Transactions that are in the ordinary course of business which do not generate revenue, but which are incidental to the main revenue-generating activities, may be presented on a net basis o this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction [F.75] . However, where the transactions are of such size or significance, separate disclosure should be given in order to give a fair presentation [IAS1R.86].




© 2007-2008 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Accessibility information Skip navigation Countries online