Derecognition of financial assets

Contents

What is derecognition?


Derecognition in the context of financial assets is the removal of the financial asset from the balance sheet through sale, payment, renegotiation, or default of the counter-party [IAS39R.9].

 

Use the quick links below to access specific components, solutions and related publications.

   
Linked components  Linked components  
 
  Linked publicatons  Linked publications    
   
  Linked solutions  Linked solutions    
   

Assessing whether or not a financial asset should be derecognised is normally straight forward. For example, when a manufacturer receives a payment from a customer for the delivery of spare parts the manufacturer no longer has any rights to further cash flows from the receivable. It should derecognise, i.e. remove it from the balance sheet [IAS39R.17(a)].

Where a company sells a portfolio of trade receivables or mortgages in order to raise finance, however, it is less obvious whether those financial assets should be derecognised. Examples of such arrangements are debt factoring and securitisation schemes.



The derecognition flow chart


The flow chart on the following page, reproduced from the Application Guidance in IAS 39, summarises the criteria for derecognition in IAS 39. A detailed explanation of each step follows after the flow chart [IAS39R.AG36].

Step 1 - Consolidation of all subsidiaries
Many derecognition structures use entities (e.g. trusts, partnerships, etc.) that have been specifically set up for the acquisition of the transferred assets. The transfer of assets to such an entity might qualify as a legal sale. However, if the relationship between the transferor and the transferee suggests that the transferor controls the transferee the transferor needs to consolidate the transferee. The derecognition principles therefore have to be applied at a consolidated level. An entity first consolidates all subsidiaries and special purpose entities in accordance with IAS 27 and SIC-12 and then applies the derecognition principles to the resulting group [IAS39R.15].

Step 2 - Identification of part that shall be derecognised
The next step is to identify the assets (or parts of assets) which should be tested for derecognition. The tests may be applied to any of the following [IAS39R.16]:

an entire asset (for example, an unconditional sale of a financial asset),
a fully proportionate share of the cash flows from an asset (for example, a sale of 10 percent of all principal and interest cash flows),
specifically identified cash flows from an asset (for example, a sale of an interest-only strip of a loan), or
a fully proportionate share of specifically identified cash flows from an asset (for example, a sale of 10% of an interest-only strip of a loan).

.

Step 3 - Expiry of contractual rights
A financial asset should be derecognised if the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset (or part of the asset) have expired or are forfeited. This is the case when a debtor discharges its obligation by paying the holder of the financial asset or when the debtor's obligations to the holder have ceased (for example, when the rights under an option expire). The asset has no value and should be derecognised if there are no longer cash flows accruing to the entity [IAS39R.17(a)].

Step 4 - The transfer of contractual rights
Some transactions clearly involve the transfer of rights to another party. An entity that has sold a financial asset has transferred its rights to receive the cash flows from the asset. An example of this is a legal sale of a bond. The transfer then has to be assessed in Step 5 to determine whether it meets the derecognition criteria [IAS39R.17(b)] [IAS39R.18(a)] .

Pass through arrangements
An entity that retains its contractual rights to receive cash flows from a financial asset may still assume a contractual obligation to pass on the cash flows to one or more entities (pass through arrangements). A transferor that is a trust or SPE may issue beneficial interests in the underlying financial assets that it owns to investors but continue to service those financial assets (that is custody of the underlying asset remains with the transferor). Additional requirements have to be fulfilled to conclude that such pass-through arrangements meet the criteria for a transfer [IAS39R.18(b)].

The entity has to perform the derecognition tests in Step 5 if the following requirements for pass through are met [IAS39R.19]:

The entity has no obligation to pay cash flows to the transferee unless it collects equivalent cash flows from the transferred asset.
The entity is prohibited from selling or pledging the original asset other than as security to the eventual recipients for the obligation to pass through cash flows.
The entity is obliged to remit any cash flows without material delay and subject to certain investment restrictions.

The financial assets remain on the balance sheet if the conditions are not met .

Step 5 - The derecognition tests
An entity derecognises an asset if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset (for example, in an unconditional sale of a financial asset) [IAS39R.20(a)].

Examples of when an entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are:

An unconditional sale of a financial asset;
A sale of a financial asset together with an option to repurchase the financial asset at its fair value at the time of repurchase; and
A sale of a financial asset together with a put or call option that is deeply out of the money (an option so far out of the money it is highly unlikely to go into the money before expiry).

The transfer of risks and rewards is evaluated on the entity's exposure, before and after the transfer, to the variability in amount and timing of the cash flows that are likely to occur. It will be clear in most cases whether the entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards without the need for a calculation [IAS39R.21] .

The entity continues to recognise the asset if it retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset. Derecognition requires the transferor's exposure to the risks and rewards of ownership to change substantially [IAS39R.20(b)].

Examples of when an entity has retained substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are:

A sale and repurchase transaction where the repurchase price is a fixed price or the sale price plus a lender's return;
A securities lending agreement;
A sale of a financial asset together with a total return swap that transfers the market risk exposure back to the entity;
A sale of a financial asset together with a deep in-the-money put or call option (that is an option that is so far in the money that it is highly unlikely to go out of the money before expiry); and
A sale of short-term receivables in which the entity guarantees to compensate the transferee for credit losses that are likely to occur .

The entity has to determine whether it has retained control of the asset. Control is based on the transferee's practical ability to sell the asset [IAS39R.20(c)] [IAS39R.23]. The transferee has this ability if it can sell the asset in its entirety unilaterally to an unrelated third party without needing to impose further restrictions on the transfer. The key issue is what the transferee is able to do and not what contractual rights the transferee has . A transferee has the practical ability to sell the asset if it is traded in an active market because the transferee could purchase the asset in the market if it needs to return the asset to the transferor. The transferor has lost control if an asset subject to a call option can be readily obtained by the transferee in the market although he has retained some of the risks and rewards in relation to the asset [IAS39R.AG42]. However, the contractual right to dispose of an asset is of little practical use if there is no market for the asset [IAS39R.AG43]. The asset is derecognised if the entity has lost control. The entity continues to recognise the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement if it has retained control [IAS39R.30] .


Continuing involvement


The entity continues to recognise the asset (to the extent of its continuing exposure) if the entity has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and control has not passed to the transferee. A liability must also be recognised in those circumstances. IAS 39 contains detailed guidance on how to account for a range of different scenarios. The combined presentation of the asset and liability should result in the recognition of the entity's net exposure to the asset on the balance sheet either at fair value, if the asset was previously held at fair value, or at amortised cost, if the asset was accounted for on that basis. The treatment of the changes in the liability should be consistent with the treatment of changes in the asset. Consequently, when the transferred asset is classified as available-for-sale, gains and losses on both the asset and the liability are taken to equity [IAS39R.33] .


Failed derecognition


A transaction is accounted for as a collateralised borrowing if the transfer does not satisfy the conditions for derecognition. The entity recognises a financial liability for the consideration received for the transferred asset. If the transferee has the right to sell or repledge the collateral the asset is presented separately in the balance sheet (for example, as a loaned asset, pledged securities, or repurchased receivable). The entity recognises income relating to the transferred assets and any expense incurred on the financial liability in subsequent periods [IAS39R.36] .


Successful derecognition


An entity that derecognises a financial asset in its entirety includes the difference between the carrying amount and the consideration received (including any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised directly in equity) in the income statement. An entity that derecognises only a part of a financial asset allocates the previous carrying amount of the financial asset between the part that continues to be recognised and the part that is derecognised based on relative fair values at the date of transfer. The difference between the carrying amount allocated to the part derecognised (including any cumulative gain or loss relating to the part derecognised that had previously been recognised in equity) and the consideration received is included in the gain or loss on derecognition [IAS39R.34] .


Retained servicing assets and liabilities


An entity shall recognise either a servicing asset or a servicing liability for a servicing contract at fair value if it transfers a financial asset that qualifies for derecognition and retains the right to service the financial asset for a fee. A liability for the servicing obligation shall be recognised if the fee to be received is not expected to compensate the entity adequately for performing the servicing. An asset shall be recognised for the servicing right if the fee to be received is expected to be more than adequate compensation for the servicing [IAS39R.AG45].


Presentation and disclosure


A transferred asset that continues to be recognised is not offset against the associated liability. Similarly, the entity shall not offset any income arising from the transferred asset with any expense incurred on the associated liability [IAS39R.33].

The accounting for non-cash collateral provided by the transferor depends on whether the transferee has the right to sell or repledge the collateral and on whether the transferor has defaulted. The transferor shall present the transferred asset separately from other assets (for example, as loaned assets) if the transferee has the right to sell or repledge the transferred assets. The transferor shall derecognise the asset if it defaults under the terms of the contract and is no longer entitled to redeem the collateral.

An entity shall, for each class of financial assets, disclose the carrying amounts of the assets, the nature of the assets and risks and rewards of ownership to which the entity remains exposed if a transfer does not qualify for derecognition in its entirety. The total amount of the entire asset, the amount of the asset that the entity continues to recognise and the corresponding liability must be disclosed as well [IAS32R.94(a)]. There are additional disclosure requirements if transferred assets that did not qualify for derecognition have been pledged as collateral [IAS32R.94(b)-(c)].



© 2007-2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
Accessibility information Skip navigation Countries online